top of page

Enclomiphene vs. Clomiphene for Increasing Male Testosterone Levels and Preserving Fertility

Explore clomiphene and Enclomiphene’s impacts on male fertility and testosterone.

Enclomiphene vs Clomid for raising testosterone levels and differences

Fertility hinges on a delicate balance of hormones, notably testosterone and estradiol, which are crucial for reproductive development and functions such as sperm maturation. Testosterone is essential for male reproductive development and maintaining secondary sexual characteristics, while estradiol, although primarily a female hormone, plays a significant role in men's health as well.

Medications like clomiphene and its newer counterpart, enclomiphene, manipulate these hormone levels to influence fertility. A retrospective study delineates the differences and similarities between the two, providing insights that could guide personalized treatment strategies.

Role of Clomiphene and Enclomiphene in Fertility and Hormone Levels

Clomiphene citrate (CC) has been a go-to medicine since the 1960s to help men with fertility issues. Its primary function is to block estrogen receptors at the hypothalamus, the brain's command center for hormone regulation. This blockade deceives the body into thinking estrogen levels are low, leading to an increase in the production of gonadotropins, which, in turn, stimulate the testes to produce more testosterone and improve sperm production.

Enclomiphene citrate (EC) is a newer, refined version of this medicine. It works similarly but is more predictable and stays stable in the body for longer, hence rendering it a favorable option in hormonal management. This nuanced difference highlights the need for a comparative analysis to discern which of the two might hold the upper hand in managing male reproductive health issues.

Study Design and Methodology

Researchers at the University of Miami studied the medical records of men treated with CC or EC for fertility issues, abnormal sperm, or low testosterone between 2021 and 2022. They strictly selected participants based on well-defined criteria and ensured no other medications influenced the results. The study excluded men with fertility issues from certain known causes, like specific genetic problems. Researchers assessed the men’s BMI, conducted consistent sperm tests, and measured hormone levels before and after treatment, with tests standardized for accuracy. The participants also abstained from sexual activity for 2–3 days prior to the sperm tests. The objective of this undertaking was to compare changes in sperm quality and hormone levels pre- and post-treatment. [1]

Key Findings

The study included 78 men in total: 46 took EC and 32 took CC. The average age for the EC group was around 42 years, and for the CC group, it was about 41 years.

Dosage and Previous Treatments:

  • In the EC group, fourteen men took 12.5 mg every day, and thirty-two took 25 mg every day. Six had tried CC before but stopped due to side effects like weight gain.

  • All the men in the CC group took 50 mg every other day, and none had tried EC before.

Hormone Levels and Sperm Quality:

  • EC and CC both successfully increased testosterone levels in 87.1% and 88.9% of men, respectively, and also elevated estradiol levels; however, EC additionally led to a notable rise in two different hormones in a significant number of participants: follicle-stimulating hormones (FSH) and luteinizing hormones (LH).

  • Both medications enhanced the movement of sperm, with EC showing a distinct advantage by increasing the total number of moving sperm in 50% of men post-treatment, compared to 37% for CC.

Improvements and Chances of Natural Conception:

  • Before treatment, 22% of men taking CC had no sperm (azoospermic). After treatment, 71.4% of these men showed sperm presence. Similarly, for those on EC, out of the few who initially had no sperm, 66.6% had sperm detected after their treatment.

  • The T/E ratio (testosterone to estradiol) altered post-treatment, but when grouped and analyzed, no significant differences were found between the different ratio groups.

Comparisons and BMI:

  • When compared, the improvements between EC and CC weren’t significant.

  • The body weight of the participants didn’t make a difference in how well the treatment worked.

As we can glean from these results, both EC and CC have been shown to raise testosterone levels, with EC also increasing FSH and LH. These enhanced hormonal levels indicate a promising direction for those dealing with infertility or hormonal imbalances.

Both drugs enhance sperm motility. EC raises the total count of moving sperm, suggesting an augmented fertility potential, which can translate into improved chances of conception. Notably, individuals with no detectable sperm pre-treatment demonstrated the presence of sperm after treatment, further signifying a monumental shift in fertility prospects. [1]

Implications and Applications

Crafting a personalized treatment plan, especially when deciding between EC and CC, is vital, taking into account your unique needs and health profile. Several pivotal factors will determine which medication is best suited to your specific circumstances. Your individual hormonal profile is paramount; if you need an increase in FSH and LH levels, EC might be more suitable due to its distinct impacts on these hormones. Likewise, understanding your history with medication tolerance and susceptibility to side effects is crucial. If you have experienced adverse reactions, such as uncontrolled weight gain, with one medication, the alternative might be more appropriate for you.

Aligning the treatment with your specific goals is equally vital. The primary outcomes you aim to achieve, whether in fertility or hormonal balance, will significantly influence the choice of medication. For instance, EC might be more favorable if you're looking to enhance the total number of moving sperm. Additionally, the type and underlying cause of azoospermia you experience can guide the choice of medication, depending on your medical history and each drug’s efficacy with different types of azoospermia.

Lastly, considerations such as your preferences, lifestyle, adherence to a specific treatment regimen, and past responses to treatments play a significant role in determining the most suitable medication for you. You might prefer the dosing schedule of one medication over the other, thus impacting adherence and the overall success of the treatment. By meticulously evaluating these factors, healthcare providers can ensure that your treatment plan is finely tailored, which optimizes the outcomes for your unique situation. [2] [3] [4]

Discover how REGENX Health’s personalized approach to fertility and hormone treatment can help you achieve optimal health outcomes, whether you're exploring EC, CC, or other options. Reach out to us today to learn more about our tailored treatment plans designed with your unique needs and goals in mind.


bottom of page